SpaceX’s lunar lander contract on hold again pending Blue Origin’s lawsuit

SpaceX has been designing a version of Starship for Nasa Artemis flights to the Moon

But SpaceX’s Starship program is relatively unfazed by Blue Origin’s legal fight

SpaceX’s $3 billion contract to build a lunar lander for NASA was put on hold for a second time on Thursday after Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin sued over the award, according to court filings. NASA voluntarily agreed to temporarily suspend the contract until November 1st while the US Court of Federal Claims, where Blue Origin filed suit last week, adjudicates the case.

Blue Origin had asked the court to grant a pause on SpaceX’s contract while the litigation plays out, according to a person familiar with the company’s sealed filings. NASA, eager to land astronauts on the Moon around 2024, agreed to halt SpaceX’s contract on the condition that all parties agreed to “an expedited litigation schedule that concludes on Nov. 1,” a spokesperson for the agency said. “NASA officials are continuing to work with the Department of Justice to review the details of the case and look forward to a timely resolution of this matter.”



Oral arguments are set for October 14th, the judge said. SpaceX had intervened in the lawsuit earlier this week to “ensure that the court has a complete and accurate picture” of the protest, the company told the judge.

Blue Origin sued NASA last week over the agency’s April decision to pick only SpaceX’s Starship rocket system for the agency’s first human lunar landing system since 1972. NASA had said it could pick up to two companies for the award, but opted for one after getting less funding from Congress than it requested. Blue Origin lodged a sealed complaint with the court weeks after its initial protest was rejected by the Government Accountability Office. That protest, filed in April, put SpaceX’s lunar lander contract on hold for 95 days.

The decision to give the contract to Elon Musk’s SpaceX over proposals from Blue Origin and Dynetics, unleashed a campaign from Blue Origin to publicly cast SpaceX’s Starship system as unsafe and lobby Congress for more NASA funding that could convince the agency to pick a second company. Blue Origin’s unsuccessful protest at the GAO alleged NASA ran afoul of contracting law and claimed the agency should’ve canceled or changed the terms of the program when it learned it wouldn’t have had enough money to fund two separate contracts. It also said NASA unfairly negotiated the terms of SpaceX’s proposal before making its award, without giving the same opportunities to Blue Origin and Dynetics. The GAO rejected both arguments and backed NASA’s decision as lawful.



Despite the delays triggered by Blue Origin’s protests, SpaceX has made swift progress on its Starship system and has moved the program along using mostly private funds. The first Starship prototype bound for orbit — a key development milestone for SpaceX — should be ready for launch “in a few weeks,” Musk tweeted on August 14th. But the rocket can’t launch until the Federal Aviation Administration finishes a lengthy environmental review of SpaceX’s launch site in Boca Chica, Texas, the company’s central Starship hub.

Update August 19th, 7PM ET: Adds statement from a NASA spokesperson.

News source

“If you liked the article, share it in ...”